Managed MCP
Managed MCP puts every connector your team uses behind a single endpoint, and lets you decide tool by tool what each person can reach. Nobody wires up a separate connection for every server, and nobody ends up holding a credential they could leak.
With Cascadia you get
Every provider you attach arrives through the same connection, so your assistant is looking at one tool list rather than a dozen. Whether a given connector runs inside your own instance or somewhere across the internet makes no difference to what that list looks like.
Access is set person by person and tool by tool, and none of it lives on their machine. Somebody in support and somebody in finance can point at the same gateway and be looking at two different tool lists, without either of them knowing the other list exists.
This is a hosted service, so the operational side of it belongs to us. No container of yours sits in the path and no certificate of yours expires at an inconvenient moment.
What you get
All 16 of these come with Managed MCP, set up and looked after by our team.
Tell us how you work today and we will help you get it running.
At one person and two tools, direct connections are the right call and a gateway would be overhead. The cost arrives with the third person or the fourth server, when every pairing turns into an entry somebody creates now and forgets to remove later.
| What to compare | Wiring each server by hand | Managed MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Connections | Connecting directly means a separate entry for every server, recreated by hand on every machine and in every client that needs to reach it. | One connection covers every connector you attach |
| Access | A direct connection hands over whatever that server exposes, because there is no layer in between with the authority to narrow it down. | Granted per person and per tool, with tools kept namespaced |
| Keys | Direct connections put a copy of every key into every person’s configuration file, which is where credentials go to leak and where rotation quietly fails to reach. | Credentials stay server side, and people connect with a token |
| Adding a provider | Without a gateway, each person repeats that setup themselves, and you find out who missed a step when something quietly does not work for them. | Added once centrally, with no need to reconnect anyone |
| Revoking access | With direct connections you have to know every server they held and reach every machine storing those credentials, which in practice means some access quietly survives. | Revoked in one place |
| Setup to maintain | Connecting directly means one configuration entry per server, per client, per person. Ten tools across five people is fifty pieces of setup to create and later maintain. | One endpoint per person, whatever the tool count |
“I’ve always dreaded website management, but Cascadia has done an incredible job with my WordPress site, making it one less thing for me to worry about.”
“I’ve worked with Cascadia for several years now. They are always ready to help in any way I ask and can implement my ideas with ease. A company that values their clients!”
“Cascadia has been great to work with! We recently needed some updates, and Cascadia was quick to get them completed! We highly recommend Cascadia Web Services.”
“Cascadia is very responsive and we’re happy with them as our primary IT vendor.”
“They do great work, been using for years. Prompt responses to requests.”
Everyone connects to the same address and sees only what you granted them. A new starter is working on their first morning without anybody walking them through a config file, and somebody leaving loses access in one action, not several.
Get startedKeep every client’s connectors attached in one place and hand each person only the ones they actually work on. Nobody carries credentials for accounts they have no business reaching, and moving somebody onto a new client means changing permissions, not redoing setup.
Get startedPast three or four servers, keeping separate entries current in every client stops being trivial. One address covering all of them removes that bookkeeping without removing any of the tools, and adding a fifth costs you nothing on the client side.
Get startedThree steps, none of which involve installing software.
You get your own gateway endpoint, and that address is what every assistant and every person on your team points at from here on.
Get startedAdd each MCP server you want to reach, whether it is one of ours, one you already run yourself, or a third party service. Credentials go in here, once.
Get startedAdd your team and choose, tool by tool, what each person can reach. They add one entry pointing at the same address you use, and see exactly what you granted and nothing else.
Get startedAsk us
Weighing us against another option? Our comparisons take the main ones in turn.
See the comparisonsIt is a managed MCP gateway. Instead of wiring each MCP server into each AI assistant separately, you attach your connectors to the router once and point your assistant at a single endpoint. Everything you have been granted shows up in one tool list. We host and run it, so there is no server for you to deploy or maintain.
Connecting directly means one configuration entry per server, per client, per person. Ten tools across five people is fifty pieces of setup to create and later maintain. The router collapses that to one connection each. You attach a provider once centrally, and everyone you grant it to picks it up without touching their own configuration.
Yes. Gateway, router, proxy, and aggregator all describe the same pattern: a single service sitting between your AI assistants and the MCP servers behind them. We call ours a router because it also decides which person reaches which tool, rather than only forwarding traffic to whatever sits downstream.
There is no limit. Each connector you attach joins the same endpoint, and its tools appear alongside everything else already connected. Tools stay tagged with the connector they came from, so two providers offering similarly named operations do not collide or get mistaken for one another.
Access is set per person and per tool. You can enable a whole connector for somebody, or pick out individual tools from it. Changes apply to their existing connection, so nobody has to reconnect, re-authenticate, or edit a config file when you adjust what they can reach.
Yes, and this is the main reason to run one. Both people connect to the same endpoint with the same setup steps, but each sees only the tools you have granted them. Their assistants show different tool lists without either person configuring anything differently.
On our infrastructure. It is a managed service, so you connect to an endpoint we operate rather than standing anything up yourself. That means no deployment, no patching, and no uptime to watch.
No. You sign up, attach the providers you want, and add one entry to your assistant’s configuration pointing at the router. There is no package to install, no container to run, and no certificate to manage. The connectors behind the router can be ones we host or ones you already run yourself.
You pay per person, per month, for the people who actually use it. Connectors and assistants are unlimited, so adding another tool or another agent never changes the bill. Adding a person does.
Any MCP server the router can reach. That includes connectors running locally inside an instance and connectors reachable over HTTPS, at the same time, in the same tool list.
The router holds them. Keys stay server side rather than being copied into each person’s assistant configuration, where they are easy to leak and painful to rotate. When a credential changes you update it once centrally, and every connected user keeps working because none of them were holding it.
In one place. Because everybody connects through the same endpoint rather than holding their own direct connections, revoking a person is a single action rather than a hunt through separate client configurations to find every connector they were ever given.
Yes. Add the router as a connector in your client and it appears as one entry exposing every tool you have been granted. This works the same way in any MCP compatible client, and it replaces the separate entry you would otherwise need for each individual server.
Ask the router. It reports back the client identity it sees, every active integration with its address, and the total number of tools currently exposed to you. That gives you a quick way to confirm a new provider attached correctly and that a person is seeing what you expect them to see.
We’d love to hear from you!
