Someone watching your automation
A business rule that stops firing does not announce itself. Issues simply stop getting assigned, and nobody notices until a release slips.
Managed Zoho BugTracker
Zoho BugTracker can hold every defect your team finds, once someone builds the intake forms, sets the severity rules, and wires it to the tools your developers already use. That part is a job.
With Cascadia you get
A business rule that stops firing does not announce itself. Issues simply stop getting assigned, and nobody notices until a release slips.
Default severity levels and due dates rarely fit how a real team decides what to fix first. We set severity scales, priority rules, and SLA targets against the way your developers and QA actually work, so a critical production defect never sits in the same queue as a spelling mistake.
The built-in configuration covers common bug tracking well. The awkward cases need more: issues created from another system, custom validation on submit, or data pushed somewhere BugTracker does not natively reach.
What you get
All 20 of these come with Managed Zoho BugTracker, set up and looked after by our team.
Tell us how your team uses Zoho BugTracker and we will take it from there.
A consultant can configure a bug tracker for you. Keeping it accurate as your modules, your team, and your release cadence change is a different job, and it decides whether anyone still trusts the queue a year from now.
| What to compare | How Cascadia handles it |
|---|---|
| Adding a project or changing a rule | Under a subscription, you ask and we configure it. |
| Bugs that never reach your developers | We connect BugTracker to Zoho Projects, Zoho Sprints, and your source control, so a bug lands next to the work that caused it and the commit that eventually closed it. |
| Inheriting a setup that is a mess | We audit what exists, walk the queue the way your team meets it, and tell you honestly which parts are worth repairing and which should be rebuilt clean. |
| Who can see which bugs | We manage roles so developers see their modules, managers see everything, and an external client sees only their own issues and nothing about anybody else. |
| Growing into the rest of Zoho | We manage the wider Zoho ecosystem, so when your bug problem is really a Desk or Projects problem, we say so, and we flag when Zoho One costs less than adding apps one by one. |
| What it costs next month | A flat monthly rate makes the cost predictable and puts the incentive on us to keep your tracker useful rather than to accumulate billable hours. |
“I’ve always dreaded website management, but Cascadia has done an incredible job with my WordPress site, making it one less thing for me to worry about.”
“I’ve worked with Cascadia for several years now. They are always ready to help in any way I ask and can implement my ideas with ease. A company that values their clients!”
“Cascadia has been great to work with! We recently needed some updates, and Cascadia was quick to get them completed! We highly recommend Cascadia Web Services.”
“Cascadia is very responsive and we’re happy with them as our primary IT vendor.”
“They do great work, been using for years. Prompt responses to requests.”
When Projects holds the work, Desk holds the tickets, and bugs live in a spreadsheet, nobody sees the whole picture. We connect BugTracker to the apps you already run, so a customer-reported defect links back to the ticket that raised it and the task that fixes it.
Get startedA shared sheet works until two people edit it at once, or until nobody can say which bugs are genuinely fixed. We move that into a structured tracker with owners, severities, and history, which frees whoever currently spends every Monday reconciling versions of the same file.
Get startedZoho One includes BugTracker, and plenty of companies pay for it without ever switching it on. We set it up against your modules and release cadence and connect the tools you already use, so you get value from a license you are funding either way.
Get startedWhether you are starting from nothing or inheriting a tracker somebody else configured, the sequence is the same.
We start with a consultation about your modules, your release cadence, who fixes what, and how a bug reaches you today. Then we look at where that breaks down, whether it is reports with no detail, issues with no owner, or a backlog nobody trusts anymore.
Get startedWe set up your projects, modules, custom fields, severity scales, and business rules, then run real issues through them the way your team would. Automation that goes live untested produces bugs assigned to people who left, which costs you more trust than having no rules at all.
Get startedWe connect Zoho Projects, Desk, CRM, and your source control, build the reports your managers will actually open, and hand over access with roles already sorted. From there it stays managed.
Get startedPricing
Pricing depends on the size of your setup and how much of it you want us to run. Tell us what you have today and we will put a number to it, with no obligation.
Ask for a quoteWe reply within two business days.Ask us
Want the wider picture? See every Zoho app we set up and run.
See all Zoho servicesManaged Zoho BugTracker is an ongoing subscription where we run your Zoho BugTracker environment for you. That covers structuring projects and modules, building intake forms and severity schemes, configuring business rules and SLA escalations, connecting Zoho Projects, Desk, CRM and your source control, and administering users and client access. Instead of hiring somebody every time triage breaks or a new module needs adding, you have a team already inside your setup handling it month to month.
Yes. You keep your own Zoho BugTracker subscription and own the account, the issue history, and everything built inside it. We work in your environment as an administrator. That matters if you ever change providers, because nothing sits behind our accounts and there is no export to negotiate. We will also advise on which plan tier fits your user count and the automation limits you are likely to hit.
Yes. BugTracker can hold test suites and test cases alongside the defects they produce, which keeps QA and development looking at one system rather than two. We set up your suites, link cases to the issues they raise, and structure the results so a failed test turns into a properly assigned bug with the environment and build already attached, rather than a message somebody has to translate later.
Yes, and it is worth switching on if you bill clients or want to know where effort actually goes. Timesheets attach to individual issues, so you can see how long a defect took to fix rather than guessing. We configure logging, approval, and the reports that roll it up, and connect Zoho Projects where the same people are also tracking time against tasks.
Natively it connects to Zoho Projects, Zoho Sprints, Zoho Desk, and Zoho CRM, plus source control through GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It also supports webhooks and a full API. We configure the connections that fit your workflow, so a support ticket can raise an issue, a commit can close one, and a bug found in a sprint stays attached to the work that caused it.
Projects manages planned work: tasks, milestones, and schedules. BugTracker manages unplanned work: defects that arrive unpredictably and need triage, severity, and reproduction detail. Trying to run bugs as tasks inside Projects usually produces a cluttered board where nothing is prioritized well. Running both and connecting them keeps each one doing what it is good at, and we set up that connection as part of the service.
Yes. BugTracker supports client users who see only the projects and issues you expose to them. That gives customers a real place to report defects and follow progress, instead of emailing whoever they spoke to last. We configure access per project so an external account sees its own queue and nothing about anyone else, and we keep internal discussion out of their view.
An hourly consultant suits a defined project with a start and an end. Bug tracking is not that. Modules change, people leave, rules stop firing, and every release shifts what matters. Each of those becomes a small negotiation when you bill by the hour, which is how teams end up not asking. A subscription removes that friction: monitoring is continuous, small changes need no quote, and we keep context between requests.
Tell us and we will look at whether the extra projects are genuinely needed or whether several modules can live inside one well-structured project. Plenty of trackers carry duplicates nobody opens. If the additional scope is real, we will quote a higher tier or a scoped project for the buildout. We would rather have that conversation than let service quality slip quietly in the background.
Yes. BugTracker is included in Zoho One, and many of our clients reach it that way. The management work is the same either way. If you run several Zoho applications, our Zoho One bundle covers the whole ecosystem rather than one app at a time, which usually works out better once you are managing more than three or four apps separately.
Yes, and this is a common starting point. We audit the existing setup, walk the queue the way your team meets it, and find the switched-off business rules, issues with no owner, dead modules, and integrations that stopped syncing months ago. Sometimes the fix is repair work and sometimes rebuilding a project cleanly is faster. We will tell you which, with reasoning, before doing either.
Start with a consultation. We review how bugs reach you now, which modules you maintain, who fixes what, and how often you release, then confirm whether the standard plan covers it. From there we collect access, build the projects and rules, and connect your other tools. If your requirements turn out to be bigger than the subscription, we will say so and quote the project rather than overpromise.
We’d love to hear from you!